Christianity Debunked

Muhammad was Predicted to come in the Gospel of John  

Read the entire essay by Mohamad Mostafa Nassar here Islam Compass

The essay reads as follows:

Just a quick note, the Arabic word “Muhammad” is an expression which means “The honorable one” or “The glorified one” or “The admirable”.  Prophet Muhammad (p.b.u.h.) was the first in the Middle East to be named “Muhammad”.  Below, you will see how Jesus (p.b.u.h.) in today’s Gospel of John had called this human Prophet which he (p.b.u.h.) predicted his (p.b.u.h.) coming “The honorable one”.

Jesus (p.b.u.h.) in the Greek Bible used the Greek word “Periklytos” which means the admirable or glorified one. He (p.b.u.h.) called that predicted human prophet “Periklytos”.  This word corresponds exactly to the Arabic word “Muhammad” which also means the “admired one” or “glorified one.” In other words, “Periklytos” is “Muhammad” in Greek.

Let us start…

In the Bible we can find the following four passages wherein Jesus (p.b.u.h.) predicts a great event:

John 14:16 “And I will pray the Father, and He shall give you another Comforter, that he may abide with you forever”

John 15:26 “But when the Comforter is come, whom I will send unto you from the Father, [even] the Spirit of truth, which proceedeth from the Father, he shall testify of me”

John 14:26 “But the Comforter, [which is] the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in my name, he shall teach you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you.”

John 16:7-14 “Nevertheless I tell you the truth; It is expedient for you that I go away: for if I go not away, the Comforter will not come unto you; but if I depart, I will send him unto you. And when he is come, he will reprove the world of sin, and of righteousness, and of judgment:

Of sin, because they believe not on me; Of righteousness, because I go to my father, and ye see me no more; Of judgment, because the prince of this world is judged. I have yet many things to say unto you, but ye cannot bear them now.

Howbeit when he, the Spirit of truth, is come, he will guide you into all truth: for he shall not speak of himself; but whatsoever he shall hear, [that] shall he speak and he will shew you things to come. He shall glorify me: for he shall receive of mine and shall shew [it] unto you.”

In these four verses, the word “comforter” is translated from the word “Paraclete” (“Ho Parakletos” in Greek). Parakletos in Greek is interpreted as “an advocate”, one who pleads the cause of another, one who councils or advises another from deep concern for the other’s welfare

(Beacon Bible commentary volume VII, p.168). In these verses we are told that once Jesus (p.b.u.h.) departs, a Paraclete will come.

He will glorify Jesus (p.b.u.h.), and he will guide mankind into all truth. This “Paraclete” is identified in John 14:26 as the Holy Ghost.

It must be pointed out that the original Greek manuscripts speak of a “Holy pneuma.” The word pneuma {pnyoo’-mah} is the Greek root word for “spirit.” There is no separate word for “Ghost” in the Greek manuscripts, of which there are claimed to be over 24,000 today. 

The translators of the King James Version (KJV) of the Bible translate this word as “Ghost” to convey their own personal understanding of the text. However, a more accurate translation is “Holy Spirit.” More faithful and recent translations of the Bible, such as the New Revised Standard Version (NRSV), do indeed now translate it as “Holy Spirit.” This is significant and will be expounded upon shortly.

All Bibles in existence today are compiled from “ancient manuscripts,” the most ancient of which being those of the fourth century C.E. Any scholar of the Bible will tell us that no two ancient manuscripts are exactly identical. All Bibles in our possession today are the result of extensive cutting and pasting from these various manuscripts with no single one being the definitive reference.

What the translators of the Bible have done when presented with such discrepancies is to do their best to choose the correct version. In other words, since they cannot know which “ancient manuscript” is the correct one, they must do a little detective work on the text in order to decide which “version” of a given verse to accept. John 14:26 is just such an example of such selection techniques.

John 14:26 is the only verse of the Bible which associates the Parakletos with the Holy Spirit. But if we were to go back to the “ancient manuscripts” themselves, we would find that they are not all in agreement that the “Parakletos” is the Holy Spirit. 

For instance, in the famous the Codex Syriacus, written around the fifth century C.E., and discovered in 1812 on Mount Sinai by Mrs.Agnes S. Lewis (and Mrs. Bensley), the text of 14:26 reads; “Paraclete, the Spirit”; and not “Paraclete, the Holy Spirit.”.

The Human Prophet

A “Spirit” in the New Testament is a human Prophet.   Therefore, Jesus (p.b.u.h.) had predicted the coming of a human Prophet (spirit) after him (p.b.u.h.) and not the Holy Spirit.  Jesus (p.b.u.h.) would not have used the word “he” for the Holy Spirit.  He would have used “it” instead in John 14:26 above.  

Read 1 John 4:1-3 below:

“Beloved, believe not every spirit, but try the spirits whether they are of God: because many false prophets are gone out into the world,” (1 John 4:1-3)

(Also see 1 John 4:6), or an inspired human, for example read 1 Corinthians 2:10, 2 Thessalonians 2:2, …etc.

There had been many cases of deliberate modification of the Biblical text by members of the Christian clergy themselves, as well as deliberate large-scale projects to “correct” the Bible, and the writings of “the early fathers,” (such as the deliberate insertion of the verse of 1 John 5:7 which is now universally discarded).

It is, therefore, possible that either:

1) The word “Holy” could have been dropped by a careless copyist., or

2) Someone could have inserted the word “Holy” to convey his personal understanding of the text.

Which was it?

In order to arrive at the answer, we must follow the same path of detective work the Biblical scholars themselves do. We must study the characteristics of the “Paraclete” and compare them to both the “Holy Spirit” and to a “Spirit.” 

Muslims believe that Muhammad (p.b.u.h.) was the one intended and not the Holy Ghost.

In the Christian’s own “Gospel of Barnabas” Muhammad (p.b.u.h.) is mentioned by name here. The Trinitarian church, however, has done its utmost to obliterate all existing copies of “The Gospel of Barnabas,” and to hide it from the masses or to label it a forgery.

For this reason, it becomes necessary to show that even the Gospels adopted by Paul’s church also originally spoke of Muhammad (p.b.u.h.).

Christian scholars see evidence of tampering, especially with the word “Spirit”:  

In the famous “Anchor Bible” we find the following quote: “The word parakletos is peculiar in the NT to the Johnannine literature. In John ii Jesus (p.b.u.h.) is a parakletos (not a title), serving as a heavenly intercessor with the Father … Christian tradition has identified this figure (Paraclete) as the Holy Spirit, but scholars like Spitta, Delafosse, Windisch, Sasse, Bultmann, and Betz have doubted whether this identification is true to the original picture and have suggested that the Paraclete was once an independent salvific figure, later confused with the Holy Spirit.” (The Anchor Bible, Doubleday & Company, Inc, Garden City, N.Y. 1970, Volume 29A, p. 1135)

We are about to see some of the evidence that goes to prove this position.

Does the Holy Spirit “speak” or “inspire”:

Important Note:  

The Greek word translated as “hear” in the Biblical verses (“whatsoever he shall hear, that shall he speak”) is the Greek word “akouo” {ak-oo’-o} meaning to perceive sounds. It has, for instance, given us the word “acoustics,” the science of sounds.

Similarly, the verb “to speak” is the Greek verb “laleo” {lal-eh’-o} which has the general meaning “to emit sounds” and the specific meaning “to speak.” This verb occurs very frequently in the Greek text of the Gospels.

It designates a solemn declaration by Jesus (p.b.u.h.) during his preaching (For example Matthew 9:18). Obviously, these verbs require hearing and speech organs in order to facilitate them. There is a distinct difference between someone “inspiring” something and him “speaking” something. So, the Paraclete will “hear” and “speak,” not “inspire.”

Muhammad (p.b.u.h.), as seen above, did indeed fulfill this prophesy. Whatsoever he “HEARD” from Gabriel (p.b.u.h.) (The Qur’an), the same did he physically “SPEAK” to his followers. In the Qur’an we read:

“(God swears) By the star when it falls! Your comrade (Muhammad) errs not, nor is he deceived; Nor does he speak of (his own) desire. It is naught save a revelation that is revealed (unto him).” (The noble Qur’an, Al-Najm (53):1-4)

The Holy Ghost was already with them:

In the above verses we read “if I go not away, the Comforter will not come unto you; but if I depart, I will send him unto you.” The comforter cannot be the Holy Ghost because the Holy Ghost (according to the Bible) was “with” them already (and even quite active) long before the coming of Jesus (p.b.u.h.) himself and then throughout his ministry. Read for example.

Genesis 1:2 “And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness [was] upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters.”

1 Samuel 10:10 “And when they came thither to the hill, behold, a company of prophets met him; and the Spirit of God came upon him, and he prophesied among them.”

1 Samuel 11:6 “And the Spirit of God came upon Saul when he heard those tidings, and his anger was kindled greatly.”

“Then he remembered the days of old, Moses, and his people, saying, where is he that brought them up out of the sea with the shepherd of his flock? where is he that put his holy Spirit within him?” (Isaiah 63:11)

“For he (John the Baptist) shall be great in the sight of the Lord and shall drink neither wine nor strong drink; and he shall be filled with the Holy Ghost, even from his mother’s womb.” (Luke 1:15)

“And the angel answered and said unto her, The Holy Ghost shall come upon thee.” (Luke 1:35)

“And it came to pass, that, when Elisabeth heard the salutation of Mary, the babe leaped in her womb; and Elisabeth was filled with the Holy Ghost” (Luke 1:41)

“And his father Zacharias was filled with the Holy Ghost, and prophesied, saying,” (Luke 1:67)

“And behold, there was a man in Jerusalem, whose name was Simeon; and the same man was just and devout, waiting for the consolation of Israel: and the Holy Ghost was upon him.” (Luke 2:25)

“And it was revealed unto him by the Holy Ghost (Simeon), that he should not see death, before he had seen the Lord’s Christ.” (Luke 2:26)

“And the Holy Ghost descended in a bodily shape like a dove upon him (Jesus), and a voice came from heaven, which said, Thou art my beloved Son; in thee I am well pleased.” (Luke 3:22)

“Then said Jesus to them again, Peace be unto you: as my Father hath sent me, even so send I you. And when he had said this, he breathed on them, and saith unto them, Receive ye the Holy Ghost.” (John 20:21-22)

Did they or did they not already receive the Holy Ghost?

Was Jesus (p.b.u.h.) not still with them when they received the Holy Ghost? Was the Holy Ghost not with Simeon, Mary, Elisabeth, and Zacharias before the birth of Jesus (p.b.u.h.)?

Was the Holy Ghost not with Moses (p.b.u.h.) when he parted the seas?

There are many more similar verses to be found in the Bible. In the above verses, we are told that if Jesus (p.b.u.h.) does not depart then the “parakletos” will not come.

Thus, the “Holy Ghost” cannot be the one originally intended since it was already with them. The contradiction is quite obvious.

Selective translation: Jesus (p.b.u.h.) too is a Paraclete:

The word “Paraclete” is applied to Jesus (p.b.u.h.) himself in 1 John 2:1

“My little children, these things write I unto you, that ye sin not. And if any man sin, we have an advocate(parakletos) with the Father, Jesus Christ the righteous.” (1 John 2:1)

Notice how the translators have managed to translate this exact same word one way (advocate) in reference to Jesus (p.b.u.h.) and another (comforter) with regard to the coming “parakletos.”

Why would they want to do such a thing? The reason is that the translators did not want the Christians, after reading “We have an advocate (parakletos) with the Father, Jesus Christ the righteous” to then read “And I will pray the Father, and He shall give you another advocate (parakletos).”

Can we see why this would make them nervous?

Well, what was Jesus (p.b.u.h.)? He (p.b.u.h.) was a prophet! Read:

“…This is Jesus the prophet of Nazareth of Galilee.” (Matthew 21:11) and “..Jesus of Nazareth, which was a prophet mighty in deed and word before God and all the people” (Luke 24:19:).

Muhammad (p.b.u.h.) was also a prophet of God. We have already demonstrated in chapter one how the verses of the Bible themselves prove quite conclusively that Jesus (p.b.u.h.) was neither a god nor part of God Almighty, but an elect messenger of God.

The concept of his (p.b.u.h.) divinity was concocted by Paul and his ministry during the first three centuries after the departure of Jesus (p.b.u.h.) and is explicitly refuted by the Bible itself and Jesus’ (p.b.u.h.) apostles.

“Another” Paraclete:

Now go back to John 14:16 and notice the words “another Paraclete.” If the comforter is the Holy Ghost, then how many Holy Ghost’s are there?

The word “another” is significant. We have already seen how this term is applied to Jesus (p.b.u.h.) himself.

In English, “another” may mean “One more of the same kind” or “one more of a different kind.” If the latter were the one intended, then the current Christian interpretation might bear some merit.

However, if “One more of the same kind” was what was intended then this is positive proof that the coming Paraclete would be just like Jesus (p.b.u.h.), a human being and a prophet, not a ghost.

The actual Greek word used was the word “allon” which is the masculine accusative form of “allos” {al’-los}: “Another of the SAME kind.” The Greek word for “another of a different kind” is “heteros” {het’-er-os}.

Prof. Abdul-Ahad Dawud (formerly Rev. David Benjamin Keldani, Bishop of Uramia) says:

“The adjective ‘another’ preceding a foreign noun for the first time announced seems very strange and totally superfluous. There is no doubt that the text has been tampered with and distorted.” (Muhammad in the Bible, Prof. Abdul-`Ahad Dawud, p. 211)

“The Paraclete is a parallel figure to Jesus (p.b.u.h.) himself; and this conclusion is confirmed in the fact that the title is suitable for both.

It is clear from 14:16 that the source thought there were sendings of two Paracletes, Jesus (p.b.u.h.) and his (p.b.u.h.) successor, the one following the other” (The Gospel of John a Commentary, Rudolf Bultmann, p. 567)

“Parakletos” or “Periklytos”?

VERY IMPORTANT NOTE:  

Some scholars believe that what Jesus (p.b.u.h.) said in his (p.b.u.h.) own Aramaic tongue in these verses represents more closely the Greek word “Periklytos” which means the admirable or glorified one.

 This word corresponds exactly to the Arabic word “Muhammad” which also means the “admired one” or “glorified one.” In other words, “Periklytos” is “Muhammad” in Greek. There are several similar documented cases of similar word substitution in the Bible.

It is also quite possible that both words were contained in the original text but were dropped by a copyist because of the ancient custom of writing words closely packed, with no spaces in-between them.

In such a case the original reading would have been: “and He will give you another comforter (Parakletos), the admirable one (Periklytos)”.

In his book “Muhammed in the Bible”, Professor `Abdul-Ahad Dawud, formerly Rev. David Benjamin Keldani, Roman Catholic Bishop of Uramiah, submits a much more eloquent and scholarly presentation in defense of these assertions, far beyond the limited abilities of this humble author.

For those whom wish to read a truly scholarly study of this matter, you may obtain a copy of that book.

The following is a very brief quotation from that book:

“The ‘Paraclete’ does not signify either ‘consoler’ or ‘advocate’; in truth, it is not a classical word at all. The Greek orthography of the word is Paraklytos which in ecclesiastical literature is made to mean ‘one called to aid, advocate, intercessor’ (Dict. Grec.-Francais, by Alexandre).

One need not profess to be a Greek scholar to know that the Greek word for ‘comforter or consoler’ is not ‘Paraclytos’ but ‘Paracalon’. I have no Greek version of the Septuagint with me, but I remember perfectly well that the Hebrew word for ‘comforter’ (mnahem) in the Lamentations of Jeremiah (I. 2, 9, 16, 17, 21, etc.) is translated into Parakaloon, from the verb Parakaloo, which means to call to, invite, exhort, console, pray, invoke. It should be noticed that there is a long alpha vowel after the consonant kappa in the ‘Paracalon’ which does not exist in the ‘Paraclytos.’

In the phrase (He who consoles us in all our afflictions) ‘paracalon’ and not ‘Paraclytos’ is used. (I exhort, or invite, thee to work). Many other examples can be cited here.

There is another Greek word for comforter or consoler, i.e. “Parygorytys’ from ‘I console’…..The proper Greek term for ‘advocate’ is Sunegorus and for ‘intercessor’ or ‘mediator’ Meditea”  (Muhammad in the Bible, Prof. Abdul-`Ahad Dawud, pp. 208-209)

God Almighty describes His final prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) in the noble Qur’an with the following words:

“And We (God) have not sent you (O Muhammad) but as a mercy to all creation” (The noble Qur’an, Al-Anbiya(21):107)

“Verily, there has come unto you a messenger (Muhammad) from among yourselves. It grieves him that you should endure hardship. [He is] fearful for you. For the believers [he is] full of pity, merciful.” (The noble Qur’an, Al-Tawba (9):128)

“He” not “It”:

Notice the use of “he” when referring to the Paraclete and not “it.” If we read John 16:13, we will find no less than SEVEN occurrences of the masculine pronoun “He” and “Himself.”

There is not another verse in the 66 books of the Protestant Bible or the seventy-three books of the Catholic Bible which contains seven masculine pronouns, or seven feminine pronouns, or even seven neuter genders. So many masculine pronouns ill befits a ghost, holy or otherwise. The word “Spirit” (Greek, pneu’ma), is of a neutral gender and is always referred to by the pronoun “it.”

Mr. Ahmed Deedat says:

“When this point of seven masculine pronouns was mooted by Muslims in India in their debates with the Christian missionaries, the Urdu (Indian) version of the Bible had the pronouns presently changed to SHE, SHE, SHE! so that the Muslims could not claim that this prophecy referred to Muhammad (peace be upon him) – a man! 

This Christian deception I have seen in the Bible myself. This is a common trickery by the missionaries, more specially in the vernacular. The very latest ruse I have stumbled across in the Afrikaans Bible, on the very verse under discussion; they have changed the word “Trooster” (Comforter) to “Voorspraak” (Mediator) and interpolated the phrase – “die Heilige Gees” – meaning THE HOLY GHOST, which phrase no Bible scholar has ever dared to interpolate into any of the multifarious English Versions. No, not even the Jehovah’s witnesses. This is how the Christians manufacture God’s word.”

“Muhammad, the natural successor to Christ,” Ahmed Deedat, p. 51

He will guide you into all truth:

In the above verses Jesus (p.b.u.h.) is quoted as saying “I have yet many things to say unto you, but ye cannot bear them now. Howbeit when he, the Spirit of truth, is come, he will guide you into all truth.”

What does Jesus (p.b.u.h.) mean by “ye cannot bear them now”?

If we were to read the Bible, we would find many verses throughout the Bible wherein Jesus (p.b.u.h.) bemoans the lack of understanding he (p.b.u.h.) was constantly greeted with from his (p.b.u.h.) disciples throughout his (p.b.u.h.) ministry:

“And he (Jesus) saith unto them (the disciples).  O ye of little faith.” (Matthew 8:26)

“…and (Jesus) said unto him (Peter), O thou of little faith.” (Matthew 14:31)

“He (Jesus) said unto them (the disciples), O ye of little faith.” (Matthew 16:8)

“And he (Jesus) said unto them (the disciples), Where is your faith?” (Luke 8:25)

Notice that these are not common Jews who he (p.b.u.h.) is saying these words to, but his (p.b.u.h.) own elect disciples.

The Bible vividly illustrates how he (p.b.u.h.) is constantly going out of his (p.b.u.h.) way to simplify matters for them and to speak to them as one speaks to little children. However, even at that, they still misunderstand. He (p.b.u.h.) is finally driven to frustration and made to say:

“And Jesus said, are ye even yet without understanding?”  (Matthew 15:16)

and “And Jesus answering said, O faithless and perverse generation, how long shall I be with you, and suffer you?” (Luke 9:41)

We are even told that his (p.b.u.h.) own people did not accept him (p.b.u.h.):

“He came unto his own, and his own received him not.” (John 1:11)

Jesus (p.b.u.h.) had “all truth,” but he (p.b.u.h.) could not give it to them because they were not fit to receive it. Therefore, he (p.b.u.h.) told them that another would come after him (p.b.u.h.) who shall guide them into “all truth” which they could not receive from him (p.b.u.h.). He (p.b.u.h.) tells us that the one who will come will “teach you all things.”

This one who will guide them into “all truth” is described as “The spirit of truth.”  We have already seen how the word “spirit” in the Bible is synonymous with the word “Prophet.”

Muhammad (p.b.u.h.), even before he (p.b.u.h.) became the prophet of Islam was known among his (p.b.u.h.) people as “Al-sadik Al-amin,” which means “The truthful, the trustworthy.”

Thus, it becomes apparent that Muhammad (p.b.u.h.) was indeed “the spirit of truth.” Since the departure of Jesus (p.b.u.h.) and to this day, the “Holy Ghost” has not taught mankind a single new truth not revealed by Jesus (p.b.u.h.) himself.

It is important to notice the words “ALL truth” and “MANY things.” “Many” and “All” means more than one.

What new and innovative teachings has the Holy Ghost given mankind which were not taught by Jesus (peace be upon him)? The Qur’an says:

“O mankind! The messenger (Muhammad) hath come unto you with the truth from your Lord. Therefore believe; (it is) better for you. But if ye disbelieve, still, lo! unto Allah belongeth whatsoever is in the heavens and the earth. Allah is the All-Knower, the All-Wise.” (The noble Qur’an, Al-Nissa(4:120)

“We (God) have sent you (O Muhammad) with the Truth, as a bringer of glad tidings and a warner.” (The noble Qur’an, Al-Baqarah (2:119)

“Those are the Verses of Allah. We recite them upon you (O Muhammad) in Truth. And verily, you are among the messengers.” (The noble Qur’an, Al-Baqarah (2:252)